Sunday, May 9, 2021

Yakuza Combat Will Forward Be Turn-Based Going

Following the reveal of Lost Judgment, an interview with Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio director Toshihiro Nagoshi and producer Kazuki Hosokawa has surfaced on IGN. Lost Judgment brings Ryu Ga Gotoku back to its action-combat roots, leaving many fans to wonder if that meant the Yakuza series would also return to that style following last year's Yakuza: Like a Dragon.Speaking to IGN, Nagoshi and Hosokawa confirmed that the Judgment series will carry on the studio's action style of gameplay, while Yakuza will continue to evolve as a turn-based RPG. "The Yakuza series has been transformed into a turn-based RPG," they told IGN. "On the other hand, over the years, Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio has accumulated resources and know-how of making flashy and exhilarating action games that are effortless to enjoy. We decided that we should let our signature action gameplay live on through Lost Judgment." Yakuza: Like a Dragon's turn-based combat Romain Mahut of GameBlog was in attendance at a virtual "Judgment Day" event that followed the Lost Judgment reveal and asked if the studio considered using turn-based combat similar to that of Yakuza: Like a Dragon for Lost Judgment. "For Yakuza: Like a Dragon, we changed the game's battle system from action into a turn-based RPG," Nagoshi said in response. "This was a huge challenge for us, but it was well-received, which we were thrilled to hear. We did discuss the possibility of developing that battle system further for our next title, and while we may pursue the turn-based system even outside the Yakuza series, the conclusion we ended up at was that because this is a different series, the best approach would be to keep them separate and refine what makes each series great. It's my hope that our customers feel the same way we do. That's why we chose 'action' as an important keyword for the Judgment series.  Nagoshi also said on the Judgment Day video he believes that, when possible, a simultaneous global launch is "the right way to go" and that the team has "determined to make every effort to support this for all [its] games moving forward." This is significant as the Yakuza series has a long tradition of Western versions releasing years after the Japanese version. Following the success of Yakuza 0 in the West, the release windows have narrowed, but Yakuza: Like a Dragon, which debuted last year, still had a 10-month gap between the Japanese and worldwide releases. Lost Judgment's action-oriented combat Yakuza: Like a Dragon is available now on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC, while Lost Judgment comes to PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One on September 24. For more on what we thought about Yakuza: Like a Dragon, check out our review here. For more on the history of the Yakuza series, read our retrospective featuring interviews with Nagoshi and other members of the team here. For more information on Nagoshi's career, you can read our profile on him here. [Source: IGN, Sega of America on YouTube]

    Latest Posts

    Epic Games vs. Apple Court Hearing Day One: Screaming Fortnite Kids, Tim Sweeney Takes The Stand

    Today marked the initial day of the Epic Games vs. Apple legal battle where in fact the former is accusing the of holding a monopoly on the mobile market later. Day is merely among the many also it was a circus the initial. To start, the dial-in number was made public, so numerous Fortnite fans called directly into demand the overall game be cut back. One yelled to the court even, “I’d suck you all to obtain Fortnite mobile back.” the chaos died down and the dial-in number was continued Once, the proceedings began in earnest, including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney taking the stand. 

    Epic Games vs. Apple Day One

    For all those that might not be swept up, the legal battle between your two mega-corporations began back August 2020 when Epic Games snuck in a hotfix for Fortnite on mobile. This hotfix snuck at night iOS user agreement, cutting round the promised 30% cut to Apple, giving Fortnite players an opportunity to purchase in-game items from Epic directly. This is a deliberate goading to obtain Apple to do something, a goading that has been successful when Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store promptly. Google followed suit also, though that court case is off still a far way. 

    Epic Games was prepared, it immediately launched a #FreeFortnite campaign using Orwell’s 1984 imagery, in addition to a 60-page document detailing how Apple continues to abuse the antitrust act. Apple fought back using its own claims that Epic violated the terms of its contractual agreement, and today we’re here. 

    The trial itself is available to the public to pay attention in on having an audio-only broadcast. It is possible to find out about how to do this the following just. 

    The youngsters alright&nbsp are;

    The courts exposed a means for listeners to listen to the ongoing legal proceedings but didn’t make certain the line was secure. Of just listening instead, Fortnite fans received unlimited power and could actually talk right to those in-house. Since this is actually the gaming community we’re discussing, chaos ensued. It had been, you need to admit, hilarious pretty. The normally somber room was suddenly filled up with gamers begging for Fortnite mobile to be restored and a lot of fans chanting “free Fortnite.” Others blasted Travis Scott songs, year an obvious homage to the in-game concert featuring the artist last. 

    I joined the decision first thing today after reporting how our readers could join me in partaking via the dial-in also it was pretty easy to understand how instantly the area changed. Of a quiet and respectful courtroom instead, the proceedings erupted right into a cacophony of fan pleas because the staff frantically tried to determine how exactly to mute the a huge selection of callers weighing in. 

    The trial begins

    today to start the proceedings

    Sweeney took to the stand, and he held nothing when it found slamming Apple because of its monetary approach back. “Apple was making more benefit from selling developer apps in the App Store compared to the developers themselves,” he said when he took to the stand. His contribution lasted over three hours just, answering questions from the prosecution and defense about Epic Games’ side of the legal fight. 

    In his statements, he managed to get clear that Epic Games has been “happy” to donate to the Apple ecosystem using its Fortnite integration, but has stated that because the relationship began with Apple this year 2010 back, his feelings have changed. Sweeney claims, in a statement that Apple denied, that the restrictions surrounding the iPhone market have grown to be a lot more strict through the entire years. He said that Apple includes a beautifully constructive market then, one that could possibly be good for so many developers, but rather, the tech company has been more centered on being truly a secluded success (a monopoly) versus being “a door” for others. The Epic Games camp then proceeded to state that Apple is predatory in the manner that it locks its users into its ecosystem in a manner that is bad for developers that are looking to showcase their products within its storefront. 

    Apple claimed the contrary using its camp saying that the tight ecosystem had not been designed to keep people out, instead it had been intended to “invite developers in without sacrificing its liability and privacy.” That notion is curious given previous documentation revealed the flimsy security Apple has regarding its storefront, rendering it “difficult” to detect fraud within its App Store. 

    Both sides then argued just what a “competitive market” should appear to be. Is Epic Games wanting way too, or is Apple narrow in its vision too? You select. 

    Today was just the beginning as witnesses and key figures from both Apple and Epic Games will undoubtedly be put to the stand to testify. What goes on at the ultimate end of the trial remains to be observed, but you can find two major outcomes which are possible (with one thousand smaller ones, aswell). 

    The foremost is that Epic Games could possibly be victorious, regardless of the judge responsible for this full case having previously stated that she will not believe that Epic may be the victim here. Nevertheless, the entire case could turn. Should this happen and the Fortnite company can prove that Apple is in violation of the Antitrust act, a provision made to protect consumers from predatory business practices also to give a balanced competitor environment, apple could be fired up its head then. At this time, Apple is very much indeed in its island: you can’t download an app without needing the iOS store, you can’t download music unless this is a certain file type – you can’t even charge your phone if you don’t employ a specific charger (unlike a micro-USB, that is most typical). iMessaging, the application form processes, therefore much more could possibly be exposed to become more inclusive to other operating-system types, making the iPhone and iPad user experience more familiar and integrated when put next against similar technology types. 

    Another major outcome is that the court favors Apple, throwing out the entire case created by Epic Games, leaving the ongoing company available to a countersuit by Apple for retribution. Remember, there are always a thousand splintering ways this may end, however the basic picture is that Epic must prove Apple is in violation or Epic loses its entire case. 

    Applying for grants the Epic Games vs. Apple lawsuit? What exactly are your predictions for after that function as outcome? Sound off together with your thoughts in the comment section below. 

    Latest Posts

    Don't Miss

    Get notified on updates    OK No thanks